Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Avoiding Disputes for Small Business and How to Handle Unavoidable Conflict



Avoiding Disputes for Small Business and How to Handle Unavoidable Conflict 

by Elizabeth A. Brown

Sowerby Law Office, PLLC


An Ounce of Prevention


                Business disputes are one area were an “ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.”  I have seen many small business disputes escalate into the tens of thousands of dollars because the parties did not have a written agreement, the agreement failed to include important terms, or worse still, contained blanks. Sometimes the parties have attempted to avoid paying the attorney by drafting their own agreement or taking a form off the internet.  Unfortunately, the parties don’t anticipate the types of issues that arise or they choose the wrong forms or fail to complete them correctly.  A properly drafted agreement would have saved the parties a lot of money in the long run and would have avoided the significant distraction that occurs because of the dispute.

Business Formation       

Many times start-ups and entrepreneurs want to move quickly in getting their new business up, running and turning a profit so they don’t want to get bogged down in the details such as:  determining the percentage of overall ownership interest between the partners; ownership of intellectual property; putting a value on services versus monetary capitalization. Decisions need to be made at the time of formation about how the business relationship is going to work:  how will ownership be determined; what is the time commitment expected from the partners; what are the roles of the partners; who will be in charge of making decisions; how will partners be paid for their efforts on behalf of the company; and how will company profits be divided.  Decisions on these issues should be memorialized in the limited liability company operating agreements, guaranteed payment agreements, employment agreements, and services agreements.
 Likewise, start-ups need to make sure that they have necessary intellectual property licensing agreements and non-compete agreements to protect the intellectual property that the business depends upon. All of these important documents need to get executed before the business opens its doors. Getting the parties to agree to these issues upfront can be tricky, but getting the parties to agree to these terms after the fact is far more difficult – and sometimes impossible – and results in litigation.

Avoiding Internal Business Disputes    

   Litigation can be emotionally exhausting for the owners of a small business and may be a distraction to the parties and a drain on the bottom line.  In the same way that divorce destroys a family, a partnership dispute can destroy a successful business. The best way to avoid conflict between business partners is to: 
Ø  Have a written agreement that thoroughly determines how important issues will be decided
Ø  Have a written agreement that sets forth the role and requirements of each partner
Ø  Regularly communicate and share financial and other business information and data
Ø  Hold regular meetings so that the partners are aware of business operations and the financial status of the business

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Sometimes, despite everyone’s best efforts to plan ahead to avoid conflict, disagreements arise.  Often when the small business partner meets with their attorney and determines how much that litigation will cost him or her; they decide that there has to be a better way to resolve the dispute. 
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) developed, as a means of avoiding much of the costly and time-consuming litigation procedure. The goal of ADR is to allow the parties to engage a person or persons (a third party neutral) to assist the parties in reaching a settlement without having to go through the complex and expensive pretrial litigation discovery and trial. There is no one ADR process or procedure.  Parties can decide what methods to use. For example, if the dispute involves a construction company, the parties might choose to select the owner of another construction company to serve as the third party neutral. Two popular methods of ADR include arbitration or mediation. 
Arbitration is an agreement between parties to allow a third party, called an arbitrator, to evaluate each party’s case and make a decision regarding the dispute between the parties.  Arbitration can take many forms, including that of a mini-trial where each party can call witnesses and bring in a court reporter so that testimony is under oath.  The parties can agree for arbitration to be binding or non-binding. If the arbitration is non-binding, the arbitrator’s decision is merely a recommendation of how the parties should resolve the conflict.
Mediation, on the other hand, is a negotiation led by a third party who can provide an objective analysis of each party’s side of the dispute.  Mediation is not binding, so either party can end the negotiation and there is no requirement that the parties settle.  The mediator can use any method that the feel will be beneficial to resolving the dispute.  The mediator may choose to talk to both sides together or may use shuttle diplomacy to help the parties reach consensus.  A successful mediation results in neither side feeling that they have “won” nor “lost.”
If you are thinking of starting a new business or are a small business owner and do not have the necessary business agreements in place or if you find yourself with a dispute with your business partners, please contact me to learn about options available for your business.

Monday, July 25, 2016

Multi-member LLC vs Single Member LLC
Why is the Liability Protection Greater?


A limited liability company ("LLC") provides a certain amount of liability protection that is very similar to the protection offered by a corporation. For example,  Samantha buys shares in ABC, Corp.;   ABC Corp goes bankrupt and Samantha loses her investment. However, as we all know, ABC's creditors cannot attach Samantha's other assets- her home, bank accounts, etc are safe from ABC's creditors. The same will hold true if instead of ABC Corp, Samantha buys shares in XYZ LLC. She will lose her investment but nothing else.

However, if the reverse happens: Samantha's assets are attached by a creditor, are the subject of a divorce action or a lawsuit,  then her creditors will be able to access all of her assets including her stock in ABC Corp. If that happens, whomever ends up with the stock will receive the dividend, attend meetings and vote her stock. That would not happen if she owned the shares in XYZ LLC because of a legal theory known as "Choose your Partner." LLC law is at least partially derived from partnership law. (In fact, the NH LLC Act, RSA 304-C, is found under the title "Partnerships" along with the law on limited partnerships, general partnerships, etc). This theory is that if Samantha enters into an agreement with Bob and Ted to invest in a business venture, SBT Investments, LLC, Bob and Ted had no intention in being partners with Samantha's soon-to-be ex-husband or any other creditor. Thus, Samantha's creditors cannot take her membership in the LLC; what they can do is place a lien on any distributions from that LLC. This lien is called a charging order. The creditor may receive money originally destined for Samantha, but the creditor doesn't get to sit at the table and vote her membership rights. All of this is assuming that there are distributions to Samantha. If the LLC isn't making any distributions, the creditor does not receive anything. This concept is codified in the NH LLC Act at RSA 304-C:126. and that statute provides that a charging order is the sole remedy a creditor may bring against an LLC membership for debts not related to the LLC. Therefore, it can be said that an LLC offers more liability protection that a corporation because an LLC offers "two-way" liability protection while a corporation does not.

Okay, so how can this work with a single member LLC? There are no partners. However, there is no exception in most states for single member LLCs and no specific statutory protection for them either. It is assumed that single member LLCs get the same protection but there is always the risk that a court will find otherwise. The New Hampshire Act dealt with this in a manner that was hoped would clarify the issue but still give some protection to creditors. A single member LLC could not make any distribution at all but keep property that was appreciating and therefore a creditor might not ever receive anything- or at least not for a long time. RSA 304-C:126 specifically authorizes charging order protections for single member LLCs but then limits those protections to give some ability of legitimate creditors to challenge the protection if the creditor can show that the judgment cannot be satisfied in a "reasonable time." If the creditor is successful, a sale of the membership rights can be forced. See RSA 304-C:126 (VI).

For all of the reasons above, I frequently will recommend that clients wishing to form a single member LLC at least consider bringing in a spouse or an adult child for a minority interest. I usually recommend at least 18 or 19% if not a full 50%. The activities of the second member can be limited in a number of ways, including making the LLC manager-managed with the original founding member the manager. If the second member is not really going to participate much in the company, then I will try to keep the percentage ownership under 20% as that is the number at which many banks will require personal guarantees of the members. A really small percentage such as 1% or 2% may be seen as illusory so I want to keep the number up if at all possible.

Obviously, there be be downsides to bringing in a minority member and those potential pitfalls must be thoroughly discussed with the clients and one of those pitfalls for the attorney- a trap for the unwary- is the question of "Who is the client?" Does the attorney represent the person who originally approached him/her, both potential members or the LLC itself? Who can the attorney represent if the "partnership" breaks up- can the attorney represent any of the parties in that case or must s/he recuse and refer to another attorney? Another question is "What effect, if any, does a divorce have on multi-member LLCs involving spouses?"